Legal Opinion

City of Muskegon Heights v. Danigelis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1931No. Docket No. 167, Calendar No. 35,561PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

This is a proceeding under Act No. 36, Pub. Acts 1929 (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 13903 et seq.), authorizing courts of record to make binding declarations of rights.

A controversy exists relative to the validity of bonds authorized by the city of Muskegon Heights to raise money for the relief of destitute inhabitants. The city petitioned the circuit court to make a declaration of rights in the premises and summoned two principal taxpayers to reply and present issuable questions. Issues of fact were presented, evidence taken, points of law raised, and the court found the bonds valid. We review by…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Trinity Universal Insurance v. WillrichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Taos County Board of Education v. SedilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  3. East Grand Rapids School District v. Kent County Tax Allocation BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Moeller, McPherrin & Judd v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Board of Education v. Superintendent of Public InstructionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API