Washington v. State Personnel Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPARKS, J.
In this case we examine the standard of review for disciplinary actions taken against employees of the California State University and Cblleges. We hold that the substantial evidence rule applies. We further hold that dismissal is an appropriate penalty for the attempted theft of public property by such a governmental employee.
Plaintiff’s employment with California State University, Sacramento (real party in interest), was terminated. An administrative hearing judge conducted a hearing, then issued findings of facts, and a proposed decision, sustaining the dismissal. Both the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Barber v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Neely v. California State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- California Youth Authority v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Trailer Train Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Ackerman v. State Personnel Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Goggin v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.