Robbins-Sanford Mercantile Co. v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). The agreed statement of facts shows that E. E. Stone and H. H. Johnson are tenants in common of the 560 acres of land in section 1, and that they executed a deed of trust on it in favor of the Union Bank & Trust Company to secure an indebtedness which E. E. Stone individually owed it. After the land in section 1 had been sold under the mortgage foreclosure decree, H. H. Johnson was allowed to intervene in the suit, on the ground that he was entitled to be subrogated to the rights of the mortgagee, Union Bank & Trust Company, as to one-half of the proceeds…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kempner v. DooleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
- Watkins & Trapnall v. WassellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1854
- Davis v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
3Cited by7 opinions
- Killoren v. HernanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. GarrottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Matthews v. MatthewsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
- First National Bank v. Meriwether Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Davis v. CullumsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.