Commonwealth v. Zamarripa
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, Judge:
This appeal follows Appellant’s judgment of sentence on two counts of rape and two counts of indecent assault. While Appellant has raised three issues for review, we find that a new trial is required on one of these issues and therefore reverse. We find that error was committed when the Commonwealth was permitted to introduce a psychologist’s testimony pertaining to rape trauma syndrome.
The victim in this case was a 21 year old woman suffering from cerebral palsy with an I.Q. of 61, which would classify her as educable mentally retarded. The Appellant admitted at trial that he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. BledsoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. SeeseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. RoundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. McIlvaineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- M.C. v. R.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. HigbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. DunkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.