Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Zamarripa

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 25, 1988No. 252PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

This appeal follows Appellant’s judgment of sentence on two counts of rape and two counts of indecent assault. While Appellant has raised three issues for review, we find that a new trial is required on one of these issues and therefore reverse. We find that error was committed when the Commonwealth was permitted to introduce a psychologist’s testimony pertaining to rape trauma syndrome.

The victim in this case was a 21 year old woman suffering from cerebral palsy with an I.Q. of 61, which would classify her as educable mentally retarded. The Appellant admitted at trial that he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BledsoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. SeeseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. RoundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McIlvaineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. M.C. v. R.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. HigbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. DunkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API