Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Dunkle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 13, 1989No. 15Published

1DissentKelly, Judge

I respectfully dissent. Although I agree with the majority’s resolution of appellant’s fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh contentions, I disagree with its resolution of the first, second, and third contentions. I find no merit in the appeal, and would affirm judgment of sentence.

I. Issues of Agreement

I agree that defendant was not entitled to review privileged psychiatric records of the victim. The dictates of Pennsylvania v. Richie, 480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989, 94 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987), regarding defense access to such materials were complied with fully. I wholeheartedly agree with the majority’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. SeeseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. KyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API