Dorothy Ann Wilson, Etc. v. Hammer Holdings, Inc., Dorothy Ann Wilson v. Hammer Holdings, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Circuit Judge.
In 1961, appellant Dorothy Wilson and her late husband, John, paid more than $11,000 to the Hammer Galleries for a painting that was expressly guaranteed to be an original work of art by Edouard Vuillard. In 1984, an expert deemed the painting a fake. The district court held that the Wilsons’ suit for breach of warranty and negligence, filed in February 1987, was barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm.
I
When Dorothy and John Wilson purchased the painting entitled “Femme Deb-out” from the Hammer Galleries in 1961, 1 they were assured in writing that “[t]he…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Back v. Wickes Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Hoffman v. Howmedica, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Cannon v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Marcil v. John Deere Industrial Equipment Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Bay State-Spray & Provincetown Steamship, Inc. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Cardinal Health 301, Inc. v. Tyco Electronics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Sebago, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Hobart E. Rosen, Norma Rosen, and Frances Lipman v. Ira Spanierman and Ira Spanierman GalleryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Krahmer v. Christie's Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.