Legal Opinion

Dorothy Ann Wilson, Etc. v. Hammer Holdings, Inc., Dorothy Ann Wilson v. Hammer Holdings, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 20, 1988No. 87-1960, 87-1961PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, Circuit Judge.

In 1961, appellant Dorothy Wilson and her late husband, John, paid more than $11,000 to the Hammer Galleries for a painting that was expressly guaranteed to be an original work of art by Edouard Vuillard. In 1984, an expert deemed the painting a fake. The district court held that the Wilsons’ suit for breach of warranty and negligence, filed in February 1987, was barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm.

I

When Dorothy and John Wilson purchased the painting entitled “Femme Deb-out” from the Hammer Galleries in 1961, 1 they were assured in writing that “[t]he…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Back v. Wickes Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Hoffman v. Howmedica, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Cannon v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Marcil v. John Deere Industrial Equipment Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Bay State-Spray & Provincetown Steamship, Inc. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Cardinal Health 301, Inc. v. Tyco Electronics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Sebago, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  4. Hobart E. Rosen, Norma Rosen, and Frances Lipman v. Ira Spanierman and Ira Spanierman GalleryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  5. Krahmer v. Christie's Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2006

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API