Mendenhall v. Kallem
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Hamilton District Court. — R. M. Wright, Judge. Aotion ou a promissory note executed by the defendant to plaintiff. Verdict and judgment for the defendant for costs. Plaintiff appeals. —
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
1. Sales : warranty: jury question m re agency. The execution of the note sued upon is admitted, and the trial was had below upon issues tendered by the defendant upon a counterclaim. The defendant alleged that the note was executed in part payment of the purchase price ox a gasoline engine which he pur-ckase(j 0:£ plaintiff; that, at the time of said purchase, plaintiff warranted and guaranteed that the gasoline engine would be in first-class working condition; that it would give perfect satisfaction; that it would be powerful enough to operate a feed grinder which the defendant then…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Redhead Bros. v. Wyoming Cattle Investment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Rice v. Friend Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Dickinson County v. Miss. Valley InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Clements v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Kinkead v. McCormack Harvesting Machine Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Dailey v. Holiday Distributing CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Drager v. Carlson Hybrid Corn Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Reinertson v. StruthersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926