Legal Opinion
Moscowitz v. Brown
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 3, 1994No. 92 Civ. 2940 (LAP)PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
PRESKA, District Judge.
Defendants move to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint without leave to replead pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2), (e)(1) and, in the alternative, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b). By Order dated February 7, 1994, counsel for both parties were notified that the 12(b)(6) motion was converted to a motion for summary judgment on certain specified claims, because matters outside the pleadings were submitted. For the reasons hereinafter stated, the motion to dismiss and the motion for summary judgment are granted.
Background
This action was commenced pro se on April 23,…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Juana GONZALEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INGERSOLL MILLING MACHINE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Spriggs v. Diamond Auto GlassCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Jackie Lauture v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Henneberry v. Sumitomo Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Lane v. Ogden Entertainment, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.