Dyer v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.
Everyone who has had occasion to study the nature and character of the controversy which gives rise to the present proceeding, must regret that it ever reached the civil courts. Dissensions among members of a religious body are first to be deplored, but it is more distressing to realize that the sensibilities have been so far excited that means have not been found within the ecclesiastical domain to .bring about an amicable adjustment of the disputes. Such, however, is the nature of the judicial calling that although we may be grieved by the consciousness that a body of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Baker v. FalesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1820
- Frohliger v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Committee on Missions v. Pacific SynodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- McClure v. AlbertiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rosicrucian Fellowship v. Rosicrucian Fellowship Non-Sectarian ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Providence Baptist Church v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Higgins v. MaherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Maxwell v. BrougherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Canterbury v. CanterburyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.