Legal Opinion

Kurt Wayne, Inc. v. Lead Underwriters at Lloyds London

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2006Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Doris Ling-Cohan, J.

Motion denied, except with respect to the branch of the motion seeking to dismiss the claims against defendant Manham in his individual capacity, for the reasons set forth below.

Background

Plaintiffs, Kurt Wayne, Inc. and Kristina, businesses engaged in the manufacturing, importing and sale of jewelry, bring this action against defendants, Underwriters at Lloyds London, Elan Manham and Associated International Brokers, Inc. (AIB), to recover the sum of approximately $1.6 million, representing the value of jewelry stolen from plaintiffs’ premises in New…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Busker on the Roof Ltd. Partnership Co. v. WarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Mauro v. Niemann Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. McGarr v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. George v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API