Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 21, 1977No. 123 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Bowman,
In 1953 and 1956, the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission (Commission) and Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) executed two leases allowing ARCO to operate service stations along extensions of the Pennsylvania Turnpike. Rent was to accrue and be payable monthly and was to be based upon specified percentages of goods and services sold- — the percentages varying with the nature of the product.. Since the execution of these leases, the Commission has regularly audited the accounts of ARCO and, though disputes have arisen in the past regarding AR-CO’s computation of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Biello v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Specter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- The Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corporation, the Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Myers v. USAA Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Ritter v. Theodore Pendergrass Teddy Bear Productions, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Abbott v. Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, LLPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- American Motorists Insurance v. Farmers Bank & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.