Legal Opinion
Alaska v. Babbitt
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 11, 1994No. 93-35684PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID ALLEN EZRA, District Judge:
The State of Aaska (“State” or “Aaska”) appeals the district court’s order dismissing its complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The issue presented is whether the Indian lands exception to the Quiet Title Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2409a, precludes the State from invoking the jurisdiction of the district court to review a final administrative agency decision pursuant to Section 702 of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 702. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
This case involves a Native allotment claim of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. MottazSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Carey Mills v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Leisnoi, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- State of Alaska v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Friends of Panamint Valley v. KempthorneDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2007
- Public Lands for the People, Inc. v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.