Legal Opinion
Friends of Panamint Valley v. Kempthorne
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 24, 2007No. CV F 07-0487 LJO TAGPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, CONSERVATION GROUPS’ MOTION TO INTERVENE, CONSERVATION GROUPS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, AND STATE’S APPLICATION TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF (Docs.25, 27, 29, 38)
O’NEILL, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Before the Court are three motions. Defendants U.S. Department of Interior (“DOI”), Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”), National Park Service (“NPS”) and several of their officials 1 (collectively, “Federal Defendants”) seek to dismiss, on grounds of lack of jurisdiction, Plaintiffs’ 2 claims to quiet title and to obtain access to the Surprise Canyon Road…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Public Lands for the People, Inc. v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Friant Water Authority v. JewellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Board of Commissioners v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- Northern New Mexicans Protecting Land Water & Rights v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- County of Inyo v. Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.