Legal Opinion
Hodgson v. Department of the Air Force
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided November 15, 1990No. Civ. A. 85-K-1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, Senior District Judge.
This is an appeal from a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board). The issue before me is whether the plaintiff, Elsie Hodgson, has the right to trial de novo on her claim of age discrimination and harassment by the Air Force, or whether she waived that right by stipulating that the matter would be heard solely on the administrative record. Hodgson argues that she has a statutory right to trial de novo. She acknowledges that she did stipulate to trial on the administrative record, but contends that the stipulation…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Harold J. Romain v. Admiral Harold Shear, Administrator of the Department of Transportation, Maritime AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Hyman ROSENFELD, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, Agency, U.S. Army, Aberdeen, Maryland, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Sher J. Rana v. United States of America, and Casper W. Weinberger, Secretary, Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. John Parker Montgomery IIICourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alvarez v. Delta Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2004
- Cohen v. AustinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994