Legal Opinion

Hyman ROSENFELD, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, Agency, U.S. Army, Aberdeen, Maryland, Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 14, 1985No. 84-1872PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether a determination by the Civil Service Commission that a federal employee is disabled should be granted collateral estoppel effect in a subsequent action brought by the employee to challenge his involuntary retirement under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (1982). We hold that 5 U.S.C. § 8347(c) (1982), limiting the reviewability of administrative disability findings on direct appeal, does not prevent a de novo judicial resolution of the reason for plaintiff’s involuntary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Batson v. ShiflettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Duffield v. Robertson Stephens & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Frazier v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  5. Nancy C. Stillians v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API