Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Union Railway Co. v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 28, 1924No. 14777PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, C.

The defendant in error, plaintiff in the trial court, obtained judgment, by verdict of a jury, against the plaintiff in error, defendant, for personal injuries as a passenger on its interurban street ear in West Tulsa, caused by the negligence of the conductor and motorman, in starting the car while plaintiff was in the act of getting off.

Defendant contends that the petition did not state facts sufficient to charge negligence of the company. The paragraph in the petition stating the acts of negligence was as follows: street railway company’s tracks and same being…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mercantile Trust Co. v. HenseySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Reed v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Choctaw, O. G. R. Co. v. BurgessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Holland Banking Co. v. DicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. McNairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Bohnsack v. Ponca City Development Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Lieb v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Rogers v. DickersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API