Legal Opinion

Kosik v. George

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1969PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

(Pro Tempore).

This suit for declaratory relief is brought by plaintiff as the daughter and only child of Earl Robert George against the defendant individually and as administratrix of the estate of Earl Robert George. Defendant is the widow of Mr. George. Plaintiff asks that the court declare that the defendant has waived and released all rights as surviving widow of the decedent in and to his estate by virtue of the execution of a prenuptial agreement. Defendant asks that the prenuptial agreement be declared void.

Plaintiff appeals from a decree declaring the prenuptial agreement void and of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  2. Moore v. SchermerhornOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Spurlock v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Watson v. WatsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Levy v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Friedlander v. FriedlanderWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Randolph v. RandolphTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Newman v. NewmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  4. Bauer v. BauerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  5. Estate of Hosmer v. HosmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API