Legal Opinion

In re Hardge-Harris

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 26, 1993No. 74422PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIGINAL DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

THOMAS, Judge.

Disciplinary proceedings by the Bar Committee of the Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit of Missouri were brought against Peggy Hardge-Harris under Missouri Supreme Court Rules 4 and 5. The information contains . two counts. Count I charges Hardge-Harris with violating Rules 1.1, 1.3, and 3.21 requiring competent and diligent representation of a client’s interests. Count II states that Hardge-Harris violated Rules 8.1 and 8.4 requiring every lawyer charged in a disciplinary matter to, among other things, respond to any lawful demand for information…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re StaabSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  2. In Re HardgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. In Re KopfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  4. In re ElliottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  5. In re TesslerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re ForckSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. In Re HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. Edwin Delamora v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  4. Edwin Delamora v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  5. In re: Nathan J. ForckSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API