Legal Opinion

In Re Staab

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 18, 1986No. 67239PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BILLINGS, Judge.

Disciplinary proceeding by the Bar Committee of the Sixteenth Judicial Circuit of Missouri pursuant to Rule 5. 1 The information of July 5, 1985, and a subsequent amended information of December 9, 1985, charged that respondent Roger J. Staab violated the following Disciplinary Rules (DR) of Rule 4: DR 6-101(A)(3), and DR 1-102(A)(5) and (6). 2

This Court appointed the Honorable Ward B. Stuckey, Associate Circuit Judge, Sixth Judicial Circuit, as Master to take evidence, to make findings of fact and to reach conclusions of law. The Master’s report concluded that respondent had…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re FrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. Matter of MendellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  3. In Re MaierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. Matter of WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  5. In Re HardgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Hellstrom v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re KopfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  4. In Re MurphySupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  5. In Re HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API