Legal Opinion
Jesse Elizondo v. City of Junction City
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 19, 2016No. 16-35129UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Jesse and Randee Elizondo (the “Elizon-dos”) appeal the district court’s denial of their motion to preliminarily enjoin the City of Junction City (the “City”) from cutting down a tree located in front of their residential property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292, and we affirm.
We review the denial of a preliminary injunction for abuse of discretion and the underlying legal principles de novo. DISH Network Corp. v. F.C.C., 653 F.3d 771, 776 (9th Cir. 2011). The district court abuses its discretion when it bases “its ruling on an erroneous view of the law or on a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Gerhart v. Lake County, Mont.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Monica Navarro Pimentel v Susan DreyfusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cars Northwest Inc. v. City of GladstoneDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020