Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Stewart

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided September 14, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00350Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION LUTHER STEVEN MONTGOMERY, : Plaintiff, : vs. : CA 22-0350-JB-MU OFFICER JAMES STEWART, : Defendant. ORDER Plaintiff Luther Steven Montgomery’s complaint is before the Court for screening because he was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). During screening, a court is required to dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint if it is frivolous or malicious or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-ii); see also Troville v. Venz,

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API