State v. Hosley
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.
In this appeal from a judgment of conviction for disorderly conduct based upon “[e]ngag[ing] * * * in threatening behavior” ORS 166.025 (l)(a), defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal. We agree that the evidence is legally insufficient to permit a finding that defendant engaged in the kind of physical act of aggression that this court has construed ORS 166.025(l)(a) to require. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment.
We describe the pertinent facts according to our standard of review, which requires us to draw all reasonable inferences in favor…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. CantwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. KriegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. William SchenkSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- State v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- State v. CollinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
- State v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.