Legal Opinion
International Typographical Union v. County of Macomb
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 11, 1943No. Docket No. 57, Calendar No. 42,410PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChandler, J.
From a decree granting defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s bill of complaint, the case is brought before this court by appeal.
The trial court filed a carefully prepared and well-reasoned opinion which we quote in full:
“The bill of complaint filed in this cause on the 4th day of May, 1942, invokes the jurisdiction of the court under 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 13903 (Stat. Ann. §27.501), commonly known as the declaratory judg*564ment act, and alleges that the plaintiff is the holder of bonds, of which the defendant, Martin and 'Branches drain district, is maker; that the. bonds, dated November…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Leigh v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- People v. DrosteMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Colborne v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Township of Lake v. MillarMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grigg v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Metro Homes, Inc. v. City of WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- City of Highland Park v. Royal Oak No. 7 Storm Sewer Drain DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Steelman v. City of PortageMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Grigg v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1979