Legal Opinion

Davis v. Paulk

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 18, 1959No. 37675PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Judge.

“The prosecution of a civil action maliciously and without probable cause gives rise to a cause of action for malicious use of process only when 'the person of the defendant was arrested or his property attached, or some special damage was done to him.’ Mitchell v. Southwestern R., 75 Ga. 398 (3); Woodley v. Coker, 119 Ga. 226 (46 S. E. 89); American Wholesale Corporation v. Kahn, 42 Ga. App. 411 (156 S. E. 324); Slater v. Kimbro, 91 Ga. 217 (18 S. E. 296, 44 Am. St. Rep. 19); Stewart v. Mulligan, 11 Ga. App. 660 (75 S. E. 991); Haverty Furniture Co. v. Thompson, 46 Ga. App.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dixie Broadcasting Corp. v. RiversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  2. Mitchell v. Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  3. Slater v. KimbroSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  4. Cargile v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Jacksonville Paper Co. v. OwenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Metro Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. PearceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Horner v. Savannah Valley Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Metro Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. PearceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API