Legal Opinion

Flax v. Sovrensky

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 5, 1928PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

This is an action to recover a broker’s commission in procuring a customer for the purchase of the defendant’s real estate. There was a verdict for the plaintiff.

The plaintiff contended that the defendant requested him to procure a customer; that he found a customer ready, able and willing to buy, whom he introduced to the defendant; that the terms of sale were agreed to and the defendant refused to go on with the bargain.

The plaintiff testified that the defendant placed the property in his hands to secure a customer at the price of $35,000; that there was a mortgage on the property for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Elliott v. KazajianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Des Rivieres v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Doten v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Pagum v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chapin v. RubyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. Horowitz v. S. Slater & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Laidlaw v. VoseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Lieberman v. CohnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Zakszewski v. KurovitzkyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API