Invitrogen Corporation v. Biocrest Manufacturing, L.P., Stratagene Holding Corporation and Stratagene, Inc., Defendants-Cross
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
On summary judgment, the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas determined that Biocrest Manufacturing, L.P., Stratagene Holding Corporation, and Stratagene, Inc. (collectively Stratagene) did not infringe Invitro-gen Corporation’s (Invitrogen’s) U.S. Patent No. 4,981,797 (issued Jan. 1, 1991) (the '797 patent). Invitrogen Corp. v. Biocrest Mfg., L.P., No. A 01 CA 167 SS (W.D.Tex. Nov. 2, 2001). Because the district court incorrectly construed the claims of the '797 patent, this court vacates and remands.
I
The '797 patent involves DNA technology.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Vivid Technologies, Inc. v. American Science & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Exergen Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Microsoft Corporation v. Multi-Tech Systems, Inc., Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. v. Net2phone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Alloc, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Invitrogen Corp. v. Biocrest Manufacturing, l.p.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Oatey Co. v. IPS CORP.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.