People v. California Safe Deposit & Trust Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
The action to recover the sum of $847.50, alleged to be held by defendant, said trust company, as a special deposit and as the property of petitioner, Emma J. White.
At the close of petitioner’s evidence, the motion for a non-suit, made by said receiver, was granted. The appeal is from the judgment of nonsuit and from the order denying motion for a new trial.
The facts in the ease appear from the testimony of Frank W. Aitken, as follows:
“On or about October 14, 1907, Aitken & Aitken received one thousand dollars, the property of Emma J. White, in the form of a check on a bank in Oakland, under…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Matter of Cavin v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- The People v. . the City Bank of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Libby v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Woodhouse v. CrandallIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- The People v. . Merchants and Mechanics' Bk.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Washington Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. DukeWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- American Surety Co. of New York v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Keeney v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Farmers' Bank v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. California Savings & Commercial BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.