Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Christy

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1933No. 31,061PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

The appeal in this case is by the plaintiffs in an action in the nature of a creditor’s bill from a judgment sustaining the validity of an assignment of an undivided interest in an oil and gas lease, alleged by plaintiffs to have been assigned by their judgment debtor without consideration and with intent to- defraud creditors.

*377Appellants urge three particular errors: that the assignment of the lease was void under R. S. 33-101, because it was made in trust for the use of maker; that the plaintiffs had a lis pendens lien on the lease…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Farlin v. SookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  2. Smith v. WorsterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  3. Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Swarts v. SteesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1864
  5. Edwards v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ingram v. IngramSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Herd v. ChambersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  3. Riverview State Bank v. Ernest. Ernest v. Riverview State BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  4. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. WATKINSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
  5. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. WATKINSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API