Legal Opinion

Herd v. Chambers

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1944No. 36,060PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This appeal involves the result of garnishment proceedings in a case, which so far as it concerns liability of Stanley N. Chambers, the principal defendant, was determined in Herd v. Chambers, 155 Kan. 55, 122 P. 2d 734, where a default judgment as to such defendant was reinstated, subject to determination of liability of the garnishee defendant Wheeler-Kelly-Hagny Trust Company in the garnishment action on the issue there framed and undisposed of by the garnishment pleadings. The facts on which such judgment was based may be found in the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Greenwich Trust Co. v. TysonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  2. Pacific National Bank v. WindramMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  3. McColgan v. Magee, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Nolan v. NolanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  5. Mackason's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Mancuso v. United Bank of PuebloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Reiss v. HagmannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  3. City of Lenexa v. City of OlatheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Territorial Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. Ackers v. First National Bank of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API