Legal Opinion

Reast v. Donald

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1892No. 7219PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Ho statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Judge,

Section B. — This suit was instituted by appellee against appellant. In form the action is trespass to try title, but in effect it is to determine the north boundary line of the Lamar survey and the south boundary line of the Tuttle survey. Appellee claims that the north line of the former survey and the south line of the latter survey is the common boundary line between the two surveys. It is admitted'that appellee owns the land situated in the Lamar survey up to its north line, and that the appellant owns the land situated in the Tuttle survey down to its south line. Appellee…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Randall v. GillTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Oldham v. McIverTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Robertson v. MossonTexas Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Schaeffer v. BerryTexas Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Higgins Oil & Fuel Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Gill v. PetersonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State v. TalkingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Petty v. Paggi Bros. Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  5. Ashcroft v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API