Legal Opinion

City of Sioux Falls v. Missouri Basin Municipal Power Agency

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 2004No. NonePublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSCH, Circuit Judge.

[¶ 1.] This is an appeal from a judgment entered following a jury verdict in a condemnation action. Missouri Basin Municipal Power Agency (Missouri Basin) 1 argues that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the description of the property to be acquired by the City of Sioux Falls (City), as set out in its petition, was insufficient. In addition, Missouri Basin claims that it was denied a fair trial. We affirm.

[¶ 2.] On December 6, 2000, City began a condemnation action to acquire a strip of land for the construction of an extension of North Louise…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. Spotted HorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Coastal Industrial Water Authority v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State Highway Commission v. BloomSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hurley v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. Spotted HorseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cable v. UNION COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Wells v. WellsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Hutterville Hutterian Brethren, Inc. v. WaldnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. City of Rapid City v. EstesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Lawrence County v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API