City of Rapid City v. Estes
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] Rapid City (City) Ordinances require a developer to complete certain public improvements before the City accepts a final plat. In lieu of completing the improvements before the City accepts a plat, the City may accept a surety from a developer. In this case, Doyle Estes; Big Sky, LLC; and Dakota Heartland, Inc. (collectively “Developers”) provided sureties which the City accepted. The sureties expired. The City sued Developers, seeking relief to have the required public improvements completed or repaired to meet the City’s standards. The circuit court granted…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bertelsen v. Allstate Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Benson v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Goetz v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Cable v. UNION COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Peters v. Great Western Bank, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Rowley v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Lake Hendricks Improvement Ass'n v. Brookings County Planning & Zoning CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- City of Rapid City v. Big Sky, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Stockwell v. McCook County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.