Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 9, 1979No. 75-220-C.APublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoris, J.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether this court should abandon the M’Naghten test in favor of a new standard for determining the criminal responsibility of those who claim they are blameless by reason of mental illness. State v. Johnson, 119 R.I. 749, 383 A.2d 1012, 1013 (1978). For the reasons stated herein, we have concluded that the time has arrived to modernize our rule governing this subject.

Before punishing one who has invaded a protected interest, the criminal law generally requires some showing of culpability in the offender. The requirement of a mens rea, or guilty…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  3. United States v. Archie W. BrawnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. McHoulMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  5. United States v. Charles FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Roe v. GelineauSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  3. State v. CorreraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  4. State v. ArpinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  5. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API