Legal Opinion

Miller v. McKenzie

California Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1933No. Docket No. Sac. 4595PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Defendant McKenzie appeals from a decree quieting plaintiff’s title to certain real property. Plaintiff claims through a deed issued by the duly appointed trustee in bankruptcy of the Fred Blinman Company, which company was adjudicated a bankrupt upon its voluntary petition. The property was sold to plaintiff “free and clear” of liens and encumbrances. That a bankruptcy court, upon due notice to creditors, whose liens will be affected thereby, may so dispose of property of a bankrupt is well established. (In re Union Trust Co., 122 Fed. 937, 939; McRaney v. Riley, 128 Miss. 665 [91 South.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gray v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Canadian & American Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Clarita Land & Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Kuntz v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  4. Sacramento Bank v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. In re Union Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1966
  2. Hindman v. Owl Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. George Thatcher Corporation v. BullenUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Rackers v. NicholsonArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Scheidel v. ListerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API