Legal Opinion

E. Clemens Horst Co. v. New Blue Point Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1918No. Sac. No. 2465. Sac. No. 2466. Sac. No. 2467PublishedCited by 22 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs appeal from parts of judgments identical in three cases involving the flow of Bear River and its tributary, Wolf Creek, to the lands of plaintiffs in Yuba and Placer counties. The three appeals are by stipulation to be governed by the decision based upon the transcript in the case entitled "E. Clemens Horst Company v. New Blue Point Mining Company."

E. Clemens Horst Company (hereinafter to be known as "plaintiff" or "appellant") has owned for more than a quarter of a century land riparian to Bear River. The water flowing to said land comes partly from a tributary of Bear River known…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Miller & Lux v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Montecito Valley Water Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Hanson v. McCueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Brown v. ReganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. City of Los Angeles v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Galiger v. McNultyMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Chowchilla Farms Inc. v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API