Legal Opinion

Rhiner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1993No. S022239Published

1Opinion of the Court

4 Cal.4th 1213 (1993)

848 P.2d 244

18 Cal. Rptr.2d 128

GRANT DAVID RHINER, Petitioner,

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, TED JONES et al., Respondents.

Docket No. S022239.

Supreme Court of California.

April 8, 1993.

COUNSEL

William A. Herreras for Petitioner.

Phillip N. Bruce as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioner.

Hogen J. Kallemeyn and Charles E. Stevenson for Respondents.

Mark R. Lippman, Haworth, Bradshaw & Chaney and C. Gordon Taylor as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondents.

OPINION

KENNARD, J.

When a worker suffers an industrial injury, the employer is required by law to provide workers'…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API