Legal Opinion
Schulman v. Royal Industrial Bank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 17, 1952PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
This appeal presents the question as to the sufficiency of the third cause of action in a complaint by one claiming to have acted as broker in the sale of certain bank stock. Apparently the stock of defendant Royal Industrial Bank (hereinafter called “Royal”) has been purchased by defendant Bronx Credit Union (hereinafter called “ Union ”). The plaintiff claims that he, through defendant Barber, interested the purchasers in acquiring the stock. The defendants may be divided into two groups consisting of Barber and Union on the purchasing side, with Royal and the other individual defendants on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Simon v. Noma Electric Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Shapiro v. Greenwich Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Shapiro v. Greenwich Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
3Cited by12 opinions
- Albemarle Theatre, Inc. v. Bayberry Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- Cuker Industries, Inc. v. William L. Crow Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Days v. Florida East Coast Railway CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Kasen v. MorrellNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Muldoon v. SilvestreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.