Cliff v. California Spray Chemical Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The defendant had judgment in an action begun and prosecuted by the plaintiff to recover damages for an injury resulting to one of his eyes from the alleged negligence of the defendant. From this judgment the plaintiff appeals.
The complaint alleges that during all of the times mentioned therein the defendant was engaged in the manufacture and sale of a certain chemical solution, known as and called Ortho Lime Sulphur Solution, for use in orchards and vineyards in spraying trees and vines; that said solution, for the purpose of marketing, was placed in drums or containers of about fifty…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Hasbrouck v. Armour & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Lewis v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Heizer v. Kingsland & Douglass Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Catlin v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Kalash v. Los Angeles Ladder Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
- Mendoza v. Cervecería Corona, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1969
- The S. S. SamovarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1947
- Childs v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.