Matter of Grimm
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The Disciplinary Commission charged the respondent, Edgar A. Grimm, with violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law arising from allegations that he maintained a sexual relationship with a client during that client’s divorce proceedings. A hearing officer appointed by this Court pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section (ll)(b) heard evidence and concluded that the respondent engaged in misconduct as charged. This matter is now before us for final resolution.
Neither the respondent nor the Disciplinary Commission has petitioned this…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Sanders v. TownsendIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Jerome Hafter v. Ruth Farkas and Jonathan FarkasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Matter of KristoffIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
4Cited by18 opinions
- Earp v. OrnoskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. CulverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- In re Robert Lee Vogel, BPR 023374Tennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- In Re KendallIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re WinklerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.