Legal Opinion

Vanderbilt v. Conqueror

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 28, 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit by the owner to recover possession of the yacht Conqueror, held by the collector of customs for non-payment of duties.

1Opinion of the Court

Brown, District Judge.

On September 1,1891, the libelant brought the above possessory action against J. Sloat Passett, collector at this port, to recover possession of his yacht, the Conqueror, which the collector had taken and held in his custody on the claim that she was subject to customs duties. The authority of the court to proceed in the matter being denied, the marshal, under an alias process, and the explicit order of the court, under its general powers and section 934, Rev. St., took the yacht out of the possession of the officers of customs into his exclusive custody; and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sleght v. HartshorneNew York Supreme Court · 1807
  2. The MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. The GertrudeDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1841
  4. United States v. Chain CableU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1836

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Biehl & Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1982
  2. Hitner Sons Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. The WhippoorwillDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1931
  4. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  5. Gerradin v. United Fruit Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API