Legal Opinion
Brown v. Hutton Group
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 18, 1991No. 89 Civ. 611 (WCC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff investors charge defendants with fraudulent conduct in connection with the sale of interests in an oil and gas limited partnership. Plaintiffs allege as a first cause of action “Prospectus and Brochure Fraud” under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). Second Amended Complaint ¶¶ 6-35. Plaintiffs also assert claims of common law fraud against all defendants and a breach of fiduciary duty against defendant E.F. Hutton Group. Defendants have moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims under § 10(b) of the Exchange…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Welch III v. Cadre CapitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. Hutton GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Phillips v. Kidder, Peabody & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Brown v. Hutton GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992