State v. Zueger
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
Douglas Zueger appeals from a judgment of conviction of gross sexual imposition, a class A felony. Zueger argues that it was error for the presiding district court judge to deny his demand for a change of judge. We affirm.
Section 29-15-21, NDCC, governs a demand for change of judge. At issue here is subsection (4) of that section which precludes a change, if the judge sought to be disqualified has “ruled upon any matter pertaining to the action or proceeding in which the moving party was heard or had an opportunity to be heard.” NDCC § 29-15-21(4).
Counsel for Zueger was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Belefski EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- 501 DeMers, Inc. v. FinkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Midwest Federal Savings Bank v. SymingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by14 opinions
- Traynor v. LeclercNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Central Monitoring Service, Inc. v. ZakinskiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Christianson v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Peterka v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.