Legal Opinion

Peterka v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 2015No. 20140425PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Shane Philip Peterka appeals from a district court order granting summary judgment and denying in part Peter-ka’s application for postconviction relief. Peterka argues the district court erred in summarily denying the application for postconviction relief, in determining that N.D.C.C. § 12.1-27.2-04.1 unambiguously authorizes multiple prosecutions and punishments based on the number of prohibited child pornographic images possessed rather than on the number of computers he possessed containing those images and in denying Peterka’s claims of ineffective assistance of…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Adams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. State v. LibertySupreme Court of Missouri · 2012

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Timothy John BakkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  2. Rea v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  3. Roe v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. KollieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Van Chase v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API