Legal Opinion

Kovacs v. Hoag

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

It is elementary in Wisconsin that agreements may be reformed in a suit in equity where the true intent of the parties is not embodied in the agreement as reduced to writing because of some mutual mistake. La Rosa v. Hess, 258 Wis. 557, 46 N. W. (2d) 737; Longer v. Stegerwald Lumber Co. 262 Wis. 383, 55 N. W. (2d) 389; Lentz v. Dostal, 212 Wis. 81, 249 N. W. 174; Shearer v. Pringle, 203 Wis. 164, 233 N. W. 623.

Robert W. Hoag testified that he drafted the exchange agreement in the absence of the Kovacs but that it was the intention that the owners of the one property were to become the owners…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Langer v. Stegerwald Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Shearer v. PringleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. La Rosa v. HessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Lentz v. DostalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Kenosha v. ScalzoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Holton State Bank v. Greater Milwaukee Food Merchants Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Breeden v. BreedenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API