Legal Opinion

Lentz v. Dostal

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

Respondent’s counsel does not dispute that the defendant is bound by the original judgment of the circuit court for Grant county imposing upon him the obligation to invest the trust funds in such securities as sec. 231.32, Stats., requires of executors, guardians, and trustees, and we therefore assume that the judgment was correct or at least res judicata because not appealed from. Paragraph (g) of said section governing investment in real-estate mortgages requires that such mortgages be “first real-estate mortgages . , . on improved farm property or improved urban property . . . the amount…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simmons v. OliverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Shearer v. PringleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Johnson v. WilliardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Metropolitan District v. Town of BarkhamstedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Kovacs v. HoagWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API