Legal Opinion
Roche Diagnostics GmbH v. Enzo Biochem, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 6, 2013No. 04 Civ. 4046(RJS)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge:
Defendants Enzo Biochem, Inc. and Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. (collectively, “Enzo”) bring counterclaims against Plaintiffs Roche Diagnostics GmbH and Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. (collectively, “Roche”), for breach of contract, tortious interference, and unfair competition under New York law, as well as for patent infringement under federal law.1 Now before the Court is Roche’s motion for summary judgment with respect to these counterclaims. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the motion in part and grants it in part.
I.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Amnesty America v. Town of West HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,266 Irene L. Wright, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Ernst & Young LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Prospect Funding Holdings, LLC v. VinsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- First Hill Partners, LLC v. Bluecrest Capital Management Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Carson Optical, Inc. v. Prym Consumer USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Maguire ex rel. Estate of Maguire v. A.C. & S., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Ganske v. MenschDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.