Legal Opinion
Pedroza v. Autozone, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided January 29, 2008No. 1:06-cr-00051PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KATHLEEN CARDONE, District Judge.
On this day, the Court considered Defendant Autozone, Inc.’s “Motion for Summary Judgment” (“Motion”). For the reasons outlined below, the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion.
I. BACKGROUND
The following derives from Defendant Autozone, Inc.’s Proposed Undisputed Facts, “Plaintiffs Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment” (“Response”), and the various depositions attached to the Summary Judgment pleadings. 1
Plaintiff Rogelio Pedroza (“Pedroza”) began his employment with Defendant Au-tozone Inc. (“Autozone”) on August 27, 1996. Def.’s Proposed…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cortez v. Raytheon Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
- Ortega v. ChertoffDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2008
- Cruz v. R2Sonic, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2019
- Gudava v. Northeast Hospital CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- Taylor v. City of ShreveportDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2014