Legal Opinion

Steese v. Steese

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.

The defendant being a non-resident, the plaintiff obtained a warrant of attachment and claims to have levied upon property of the defendant on or about April 14, 1931. Subsequently the summons was served personally without the State. This motion is to set aside such service.

Subdivision 6 of section 232 of the Civil Practice Act provides for an order of service by publication “ where it appears by affidavit that a warrant of attachment, granted in an action, has been levied upon property of the defendant within the state.” Section 235 of the Civil Practice Act provides in part that “ where it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dimmerling v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Dos Passos v. MortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. Cole v. Nash Motors Co.New York Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Korytkowski v. GreniewickiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  5. Erskine v. Nemours Trading Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goodale v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API