Legal Opinion

Cole v. Nash Motors Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.

This motion is made upon notice, by the defendant Nash Motors Company, upon the original papers upon which the warrant of attachment against said defendant was issued, and the order directing service of the summons in the action upon such defendant was granted, to have such warrant and such order of publication vacated and set aside.

The action is brought to recover a sum of money only.

As against this defendant, a foreign corporation not doing *923business in this State, the action could only be initiated by a warrant of attachment, duly granted, and pursuant to which property belonging to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dimmerling v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. McCracken v. . FlanaganNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Rome Trust Co. v. CummingsNew York Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Friedman v. PrescettiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  5. Seidenburg v. PesceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heitzmann v. Willys-Overland Motors, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1946
  2. Jones v. Rochester Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Kohn v. Wilkes-Barre Dry Goods Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1930
  4. Lefferdink Steel Service Corp. v. LitNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Steese v. SteeseNew York Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API