Legal Opinion

Scannell v. City of Dunkirk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 30, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed on the law and facts, without costs of this appeal to any party, and judgment directed to be entered in favor of the defendants adjudging that the amendment to the Dunkirk Zoning Ordinance, adopted by the Common Council of the City of Dunkirk, Kew York, on the 17th day of June, 1958, is valid. Certain findings of fact disapproved and reversed and new findings made. Memorandum: We find in this record sufficient evidence to sustain the validity of the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance enacted by the Common Council in June,. 1958. Upon parties, such as these plaintiffs, who…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Shepard v. Village of SkaneatelesNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Scannell v. City of DunkirkNew York Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kravetz v. PlengeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API